Oh those Peace Leaving Environmentalists

I've said it before and I'll say it again, hippies are filthy animals and pretty much criminal thugs when it comes to the environment. Of course they couldn't even fit "environment" on one of the largest consumer vehicles out there, but these people are not friendly nor law abiding. These eco-terrorists constantly whine about the Bush Administration's "aggression" but they believe that by limiting the number of humans on Earth (as if this is something that would be achieved peacefully) is one of the best ways to stop Global Lying. Take special note of the fact that people in this "left-leaning" (translation: Mega Left) have a look of "smug satisfaction" and that the neighbor seems not to care at all that her neighbor is the victim of crime and he got what he deserved because it's "ridiculous to be driving a Hummer." What a stupid bitch. It's this man's God given right to choose freely what vehicle he wants to own, and if he can afford the car and the gas, he has every right to own the vehicle he chose on the FREE MARKET. Can't tell these eco-assholes this, no way, they wont' hear it. It's their "left-leaning" ways or they will commit a crime against you and act "smug" and take "satisfaction" at your victimization. That dumb bitch was driving a Prius too. South Park anyone? It's a SMUG ALERT. Seriously what a bunch of dicks, witnesses saw what happened and yet police have no leads? I'd say that's obstruction pure and simple as well as aiding and abetting. Here's another fact: CODE PINK, HARD CORE LIBERAL MOONBAT THUGS WERE IN DC FOR HARRY'S REID'S HAPPY TIME SLEEPOVER AT CONGRESS. Don't think the two are connected. The guy had these vehicles for a while and what's to stop one of these Moonbats from destroying a piece of the American Free Market when they are going back to San FranLeftCoast or some other God forsaken city at the end of the political charade? Yea, I'd say the two are related. I'd also highly advise people to really look at the political crimes that "ordinary" people commit because they almost all seem to be directed at people who are not following the hard left's political goals. So who's really the fascists in this nation? When's the last time you saw a Prius get smashed in? Thought so.
-Caomhin

Liberals attack Catholics...again.

The Archdiocese of New York was to be honored for 200 years of service and dedication to the community and in a resolution in the House of Reps controlled by the Liberals, they decided not to pass the honor because, gasp, it mentioned Cardinal Egan by name, a blatant way to veil their true anti-Catholic feelings. Henry Waxman (D-Fantasyland) refused to pass the honor because it mentioned the leader of the Archdiocese and Waxman has it in for Catholics due to the scandal. Really though, unless the honor was to be bestowed to a leader of a terror supporting Muslim (perhaps the leader of CAIR) do you think he would have held it up? Is it any surprise that the Democrats refuse to honor Cardinal Egan and yet find it OK to kill the "John Doe Bill" which protects American citizens from lawsuits when they report suspicious behavior to the authorities. That's right, Waxman and liberal retards refuse to recognize the accomplishments of the Church and the faithful parishioners in New York because it mentions Egans' name directly, a man who has done a great deal of good during his service (admittedly he handled the scandal wrong) yet will allow you or I to get sued if say for example, a man chanting "Allah Akbar" were to enter an airport with a suspicious package and what would appear to be a gun on his person. Yes, Waxman and the asshats in his party can say that they want this to be simply a personal attack on Egan, but given their completely opposite stances on a multitude of issues that the Catholic Church represents (ex. abortion, anti-euthanasia, abstinence, The Ten Commandments, and oh yea....JESUS) can you seriously think that refused to pass this honor based on Egan personally or their overall disdain for the Catholic Church, which is constantly under assault from the Liberals over the ACLU and the other groups that form the base of the Democratic Party? Yea, it's pretty clear that they hate Jesus and Catholicism while all the while saying how religion is to them, but solely for the purpose of exploiting people so they can get votes.
-Caomhin

Can the Military Ever Again Trust the Liberals?

Let's examine the lack of support for the military by the liberals currently running Congress. They consistently say that we have no reason to be in Iraq, that they support the troops but not the mission, which is killing innocent civilians (logically they are saying that they really mean and that the troops are killing innocent civilians). The Dems have attempted to thwart our soldiers from receiving the funds they need in order to protect themselves and fight the factions of Islamic barbarians who want nothing more than to see every American either praying towards Mecca or to see us all dead. Why play politics with the troops lives? If they want to try to vote to deauthorize the war, they can fight that political battle (and lose yet again), but they have made it personal with the military by withholding votes that mean our soldiers' very lives. Again, they hold some staged sleepover event last night to appease the hard core left and have stated numerous times that they will not even listen to what General Petraeus says in September (hell they did not even want to wait to her him, perhaps they are afraid his report will be positive and their defeatist views will be exposed for the pile of political shit that it is). They have consistently undermined our troops every step of the way. What then are the views of the soldiers, knowing how far out the way the Democrats have gone to criticize our troops and demoralize them in every conceivable way? They keep comparing the war in Iraq to Vietnam, which is beyond absurd in every aspect. How can our troops feel even remotely like taking orders if, God forbid, the Democrats take the Executive and Legislative Branch of the government? What's more, how angry will the military be when Al Qaeda claims they routed us in Iraq, something that is not happening, it's a fight we are winning, but the Democrats do not have the spine to stick to the fight and allow us to win. In a plausible scenario, what happens if an attack happens on American soil under a Liberal and said Liberal orders military action? How would you respond? Knowing that the person ordering you into action has already been on record to essentially say your commanders are liars and incompetent, how could you take orders from this person? How could you go off to fight terrorism knowing that if the going gets rough the Commander (in this case Liberal Idiot) in Chief is not going to support you 100% and allow you to fulfill your mission? In this nightmare situation, one that, to me is plausible, the moral of the military may be at an all time low if the people in charge of their orders are the same people who have constantly criticized everything they do, are, and stand for, from their level of education, to their ability, to their assessments. Can the Military Ever Again Trust the Liberals?
-Caomhin

Some of G-Dub's Accomplishements

Just a reminder:
1. North Korea shuts down their nuclear reactors and is asking for negotiations to dismantle their weapons programs. Remember when Clinton was in office and they agreed to do the same, took our money and laughed at the Liberal retard? Well Bush got it done.
2. Libya ends it programs for Weapons of Mass Destruction and exports of the material used in the program out of the country.
3. Two Dictatorships and completely brutal regimes shut down and replaced with fostering democracies (and will be sustained if the Dems stop trying to force us not to win). Two terrorist regimes wiped off the face of the map.
4. Dow Jones on the verge of 14,000 points.
5. Near record unemployment.
6. No recession started under President Bush. He inherited one and his tax cuts kept us out of going into a longer recession or starting a new one.
7. All time record for minority home ownership.
8. Shrinking budget deficit that was created by funding two wars that, when you look it from the perspective as being unexpected wars when his time in office started, is a pretty remarkable thing.

The big down side:
Higher gas prices. Of course this is more attributed by liberal refusal to have allowed more refineries to be built over the years, global demand, and their recklessly dangerous Global Warming lies among other reasons. Not his fault per se, but he could have attempted to ram through some refinery authorizations so I'll ding him for that.

Plus, if he holds his ground on the Iraq War I'll be willing to forgive the whole amnesty thing.

The All Night Political Stunt

I know by now it's old news that the Democrats tried to appease the wack jobs on the far left...and failed miserably. Really I'm hoping that we can just drive them over the edge and remind them that DICK CHENEY WAS THE PRESIDENT FOR A SHORT PERIOD OF TIME when G-Dub was under the knife a few years back. So I think what would be the greatest way for Bush to end his presidency would be to resign on the day before last, let Cheney take over for that day so Bush can kick Murtha, Reid, Levin, and Schumer in the balls and then bitch slap Pelosi and Hitlery....and then be immediately pardoned by Cheney. How awesome would that be?

Worst part of the whole charade?
My tax money paid for the Defeatists pizza. That just pisses me off. They're playing sleepover in "support of our troops" and delayed on giving our troops the funds they needed to protect themselves, the Iraqis and accomplish their mission, and they took our money and bought Dominos. Assholes.

I'm not Paying for you to Murder your Baby

So according to this article over at the Chicago Tribune, Liberal fetus genocide proponents Hitlery Clinton, Barak Obama, and liar extraordinaire John Edwards (well his wife said it but let's face it there's two Americas, and apparently his two smallest Americans were removed a long time ago) all want our tax money to pay for women to have babies murdered. Somehow according to them, cracking a baby's skull open or running through a pureeing machine is health care in which every woman is entitled. Now keep in mind they want this to be paid for by our taxes. First of all, I'm not paying for anyone to murder a baby. Morally it's reprehensible. Second of all, I'm Catholic and I'm not ashamed to say that religiously this is a mortal sin, I believe that full heartily. They are violating the Separation of Church and state clause here big time. Third of all, economically I oppose this since those who do not need nor want abortions are to subsidize the slaughter of the unborn. So everyone who does not need or want an abortion will begin to pay more in health care to kill babies. I won't have any part of it. It's truly terrifying what these assholes will attempt to do if they somehow get the White House and the Legislature. These people have no morals and DEMOCRAT'S DON'T CARE ABOUT BABIES!
-Caomhin

Will Democrats Surrender California?

I'm just wondering when they'll pull the trigger and surrender California, a state approximately the same size as Iraq. 7,302 Americans were murdered in California between 2003 and 2005 (the last updated statistics available to me, attainable at www.disastercenter.com). During the same time frame 2,181 Americans were murdered in Iraq. A total of 3,623 Americans have been killed in Iraq since the war began (these figures were gathered from www.icasualties.org). The population in California is approximately 36 million and the population in Iraq is approximately 27 million. Even factoring for population size, more Americans are murdered in California than they are in Iraq. The difference of course being that our soldiers are fighting our enemies who seek to destroy us and our way of life while helping the Iraqis foster a young democracy and become self sufficient. Compare this to the situation in California. Democrats demand a completely secure border in Iraq. A nation that has substantially larger land borders than California and admittedly this is a problem since Islamic terrorists from across the Middle East are pouring into Iraq in order to attack our troops. The Democratic solution to this is to cut and run and allow Iraq to slip into complete and total chaos, allowing it to be ran by those who are not Iraqi. This should not surprise you seeing as how they attempted to ram amnesty down our throats in order to give aid and support to people who sneak into our nation along the smaller land border in California. They also fight for murder and child rapists rights through the ACLU, again showing a pattern of having no spine and having a strong desire to simply hand over true control to the criminal element no matter what the degree of psychosis they exhibit. They say that value can not be placed on human life, but the Democrats are doing just that. They are willing to allow genocide in Iraq by adopting policies that according to Harry Reid will win them more seats in Congress. So screw the Iraqis, let them bleed out, as long as the Liberals win more seats, it's worth it to them. So why not pull out of California? They'd sure pick up the Hispanic vote in droves, and so many Americans are murdered there I'm sure they can't stomach that either, but then they'd lose seats in Congress if they did, but rest assured if they leaned to the right there, they'd probably do it without a second and call it "reconciliation" with Mexico. So if gang violence results in a great deal of murders (and gangs are a major source of all those murders) and the average citizen wants nothing to do with the violence and just wants to live their lives in peace, that would qualify as a civil war according to Liberal standards in Iraq. Vote now, Surrender California!!!! We can not officiate the gangs civil war!!!!
-Caomhin

So What Exactly DO Democrats stand for?

The party is so full of fence straddling concepts that is nearly impossible to comprehend. Every single member of their party is able to take both sides of an issue simultaneously that "flip-flopping" is not appropriate but a term like "buy one get one free" is much more appropriate. Let's take a look at some examples:

1. The War in Iraq. Hard lefties say it is inhuman and against world law that the war continues. That we are just killing everyone with no regard for life. They say this is deplorable. Yet they say they support our troops, who are conducting the very mission that they oppose. Fence straddling complete: Dems vote to cut the funding of the troops, tell them their mission is a failure even before the Surge reaches full strength, but yet they support the troops. Yes, I question their patriotism.

2. Feminism. Hillary will get all of the militant feminist votes. Hillary is a feminist, she says so all of the time. Yet what kind of feminist would allow her husband to cheat, seemingly from the moment that they hooked up, and not do anything about it. Sure, she says religion (which I will get to shortly) got her through her marriage. Interesting mainly that she was speaking about the Lewinsky matter. Yet what about all of those other women earlier on? If not her thirst for power, wouldn't she have stood up to Bill and left the marriage if only to prove she wouldn't be walked all over? What kind of a feminist lets their husband cheat and does nothing about it? I mean if ethics is the driving force behind feminism, not money and power, surely she would have done something in a feminist manner. The fact is she is nothing more than power hungry hag who will exploit feminism for every vote its worth, but she definitely is not a feminist, despite what she or the media tell you.

3. Religion. This is one of the greatest examples, and its very short. The far left ACLU has great sway in the Democratic party, and not vise versa. So how is it then that Democrats always side with the ACLU in questions of Church versus state, yet claim they follow their respective faiths and live religiously. The ACLU is in an open state of war against religion and our laws in general, and the Democrats ALWAYS back them up. They gleefully watch as the ACLU helps to destroy the religious values in our nation, while the only time you hear about their faith is election time. They are even upset that President Bush had the audacity to give federal money to religious charities working with underprivileged people. Screw the underprivileged if they get help from Christians eh Lefties?

4. Unions. Sure they voted to gut they money that helps enforce that unions have open disclosure to government and can now watch over your shoulders at work and "persuade" you to vote along the leaderships lines, but the amnesty bill sure is opposed by the Unions isn't it? That's kind of like giving someone a severance package right before replacing them with cheaper, equally effective labor isn't it?

5. President Bush. He's a bumbling idiot who pulled the wool over everyone's eyes in a lead up to Iraq and fooled the entire world. Yea, sounds like a real idiot to me. Problem is President Bush has done a pretty good job. Let's just look at the economy for example, isn't it pretty amazing that there has been no recession since book took office and got the tax cuts done? Given the close nature of Congress and President Bush yielding a big Veto pen, if they can keep stopping the wave of taxes (such as the Energy bill) from getting enacted, I wonder what history will say when he walks out of office as NEVER HAVING A RECESSION during his time in office. Doesn't sound stupid to me Lefties, sounds pretty damn impression. As far as being "evil", isn't rather evil of yourselves to want to see Iraq and the entire middle East in carnage if we pull out early. Wanting to take out a dictator who murdered nearly 1 million people in order to give people freedom from tyranny is such an evil act right? Or is the evil in wanting to see that freedom never occur.

I could go on forever, but you get the point. It's not flip-flopping, its just their politics, by being on both sides of the issues from the jump, they are not held responsible, and since it's a proven fact now, thanks to the report that showed donations going 9 to 1 for Democrats from reporters, the media shouldn't ignore it. But it can, and it will, all in hopes another Democrat comes into office and sets up country up for economic troubles, terrorist capitulation, deterioration of morals, and ethics, and hopes for making it illegal that their views do not get 50% of discussion time, no matter how horrible and illogical it is by reviving the Fairness Doctrine. Democrats stand for nothing, but making a small percentage of people very rich and keeping everyone else poor and doing all the grunt work, all by tricking you into thinking you're "saving the world" and "progressive". Let's face it, large tax cuts aren't going to handicap the very rich, but the middle class? Hell yea it will, and the Dems will tax you back to the lower class with the quickness, and if their hopes of using junk science to show climate change (IT'S THE SUN, STUPID) you better get a job damn close to home and forget every flying again, because they need gas to dry up to get their mission accomplished. People really need to wake up, and quickly.

6.

First Debate Results

The first debate is over and one point is very, very clear. I hate MSNBC with a passion. Chris Matthews and Keith Olberman should have been wearing their Bolshevik hats, holy shit are they communists. Anyway, I took notes during the debates and here is what I came away with. I’ll rank the candidates from worst to best for the purposes of how they performed last night.

10. Tommy Thompson – extremely boring, did not say anything that really piqued my interest. I’m guessing he’s the first to pull out and will do so soon

9. Duncan Hunter – very strategical individual with a strong affinity for the military. Was articulate. No notable quotes from him, he has no chance at the nomination but due to his tactical knowledge, will be in the running for Secretary of Defense when we win the 2008 election.

8. Sam Brownback – I liked him as a person. Always have. He pops up from time to time on Fox. Comes across as someone that everyone likes but he won’t get the nomination because he is too conservative socially, which is not a bad thing at all, but it’s just the reality of this election cycle. Is in favor of the national flat tax (which is a great idea) as opposed to our current tax system. Also highlighted the main difference between our party and those of the Defeatocrats. He accomplished this by refusing Comrade Matthews’ attempt to get him to criticize Giuliani when he said their debate and campaign will be on ideals and complimented all of the candidates for being the party of ideas and being cordial to one another despite differences of opinions on many issues. Ideas, cordiality, difference of opinion are terms not found in the Democrat’s party. Class act.

7. Tom Tancredo – Best on the issue of immigration. Matthews didn’t like the guy so we didn’t get to see too much of him, but he has a definite no-nonsense aura around him. I especially liked his using his highly suspect and skewed limited time by calling for the pardon of the two border patrol agents**** who are inexplicably in jail when Matthews tried to give ammo the Democratic nut roots when he asked about Scooter Libby.

6. Jim Gilmore – Another candidate who did not get much air time, but he let it be known that he is a very consistent candidate who has not changed his position on the issues and has a staunch conservative record. A little boring, but was well spoken and got a lot accomplished on limited time.

5. John McCain – He was very angry last night and that’s not a good thing. I’ve always like McCain but he did himself some damage seeing as he was in first or second in most polls lately. Had an outstanding line when he asked, “The Senate Leader says we’ve lost the win so who wins? Al-Qaeda. What were they cheering for in the House? Surrender. The war on Iraq is now on the right track after being horribly mismanaged.” Also chimed in “I will follow Bin Laden to the gates of Hell,” in reference to capturing the camel rapper. But man was he angry, and he also waffled a bit on religion.

4. Rudy Giuliani – First the bad. It was painful watching him explain his position on abortion. I knew it would be tough for him, but wow he tanked that. He also relied too much on his time as mayor. He can’t keep doing that or he’s asking for trouble. However, he did make great points, I especially liked when he said the AMT and death tax goes to 0 in 2010 and that creates a terrible incentive before going back up in 2011. For those who do not know what this means, it means that if someone dies in 2010 everything they leave to their heirs is tax free. So you can see what incentive Rudy is talking about. He also called out the Democrats in that “not one Democrat mentioned Islamic Fascist terrorism”. Great point. He struggled a bit explaining the differences between Sunni and Shia Muslims, but it’s interesting that not even the trap laying Matthews mentioned Wahabi (see Saudi Arabia). Overall not too bad of a performance, but it definitely wasn’t his best.

3. Ron Paul – I know what you’re thinking. A lot of hardcore conservatives probably think I’m an idiot. Let’s look at his faults. He opposed the Iraq war (voted against it), and is very Libertarian. However, I myself am a little on the Libertarian spectrum as compared to true conservatism, but I am a proud Republican. That being said, I do favor a national ID card system (a photo voter ID card would be sufficient) to cut down illegal immigration and stop the dead from voting or having another person cast your vote (something the Democrats are notorious for in inner cities) since they no longer have to ask you for your voter registration card because it’s “harassment”. Stupid Democrats. That being said, he says he is not a flip flopper because “I voted to impeach him,” in reference to Mr. Clinton. Good line. Wants to abolish the IRS and cut taxes by taking a non-interventionist foreign policy. He also keyed in on the internet which was pretty revolutionary since most candidates just touch on it, or in Barak Obama’s case, steal people’s web pages*****. He also was the only candidate in either party to mention how IMPORTANT it is TO KEEP THE INTERNET TAX FREE WHEN YOU BUY THINGS ONLINE, and issue we should all get behind. He said he trusts the online news more than mainstream media, which is happening almost everywhere, and you can see that by the declining newspaper subscriptions nationwide. Wants to eliminate the inflation tax, which is a great idea, but didn’t say how this was achievable. He also stated it’s the governments job to protect the privacy of all citizens, which means he is not in favor of ID cards (bad) but is in favor of fencing off Mexico (good). Overall, he’s pretty original, charismatic, and a good public speaker. I found myself really liking this guy, and I would love to see him run the IRS…..into the ground….as Secretary of Commerce.

2. Mike Huckabee – Extremely impressive and very likeable. Made a big point of saying that it’s criminal that CEOs can outsource jobs and then turn around and take huge bonuses while families are shit out of luck. On religion he had a great, great quote, and it’s unclear whom he was talking about but said, “Real faith should have an impact on all your decisions, and if it does not you have marginalized your faith.” Classic. Another gem, “We celebrate life, going in the rescue he miners in West Virginia and the climbers at Mount Hood. It was separates us from the jihadists. Jihadists strap bombs to children’s bellies.” Awesome job here too. In reference to the Clintons (being that he too is from Arkansas) he said, “No one knows the Clintons more than I do. It would be a mistake to have either one of them in the White House.” I really like this guy. In fact, I’m going to go out on a limb and say that he winds up being the Vice Presidential candidate on the ticket in ’08, if for no other reason than I don’t see the Big 3 take a VP seat. Don’t get me wrong, I’d be happy if Huckabee pulled this off based on his performance last night, but since money is such a huge factor, I’ll pull hard for him to be the VP.

1. Mitt Romney – Yeah, hands down he won. It’s funny because yesterday I talked to someone who was a big fan of his and he told me to give him a fair shake and I did. Wow, was he impressive. Extremely articulate and has an awesome presence on the camera. There is no doubt he’s crush Hillary RODHAM Clinton in a debate as he is very fluid and seems to be speaking from the top his head with pure ease. He promised to Veto overspending, pointing out he did that very often in Massachusetts. He came out as very much opposed to anti-cloning and seemed way ahead of everyone in the room including Matthews who tried to trip him up over the stem cell issue and was almost confused when Romney started to talk about nuclear technology to create additional stem cells. This was important because it shows he’s up on the issues and technology, something I know the Dems aren’t up on. He also said “The Gang of Three running the war on terror, Clinton, Reid, Pelosi,” would be disastrous. Very True. He also spelled out radical Islam very well by stating their objectives of creating a caliphate, brining down the USA, and that the war is more than just Bin Laden. Going into this debate, I had him fourth or fifth on my candidate list, but he shot up the list real quick. He is very innovative as evidence by how he campaigns (i.e. letting students keep some of the money they raise for his campaign). I’m expecting the MSM to go after the Mormon faith any day now, which of course will just be hypocrisy out the ass because supposedly Dems favor Freedom of Religion, which of course they don’t. Hands down the most impressive person on stage.

Overall, I’m getting a bit more excited about our candidates. After having watched the debacle that was the Democrat’s debate, you can see how much stronger our candidates are. They fielded questions they were not prepped on, had questions come in from ordinary citizens, and were not over coached, as were the Democratic counterparts. The advantage of this debate, run by a hard liberal network, is that now they will all have the experience of being asked stupid, moonbat questions right out of the gate and will be better apt as far as what to expect. Another advantage will come when the eventual winner gets into the Town Hall Debates with the Dem candidate. After watching tonight, I’m convinced that if someone from this field wins the nomination (Fred Thompson will be a top 3 candidate when he announces) it will be Giuliani or Romney. They did no harm to themselves, and gave some excellent answers. McCain may have royally screwed himself by being so angry and throwing some quotes out that may burn him badly. All in all, a good night.

Gas Companies Rated, Global Whining Free

Gas prices suck. Being that I drive about 30+ thousand miles a year (AWESOME Carbon Footprint, Suck it Al Gore), I pay out the ass. Filled up the thank on the Subaru today, ran me $33.50. On top of that, I see this May Day Socialist bullshit where Harry Reid, I mean Hugo Chavez, nationalizes their oil fields for the “people.” What a crock of shit. If the “people” means the people’s faces on Venezuelan money, that’s the only way it’s the truth. Turns out that the only two companies who put up somewhat of a fight to this Stalinist move was ConocoPhillips and Exxon Mobil. Which got me to thinking, if I have to pay out the ass I may as well pay out the ass to one of the companies who I actually have some semblance of respect. I surveyed most of the companies we see here in the Lehigh Valley and come to some conclusions. After having some respect for ConocoPhillips, after learning of their strong pro-Gore stance, I refuse to give any money to any of their affiliates due to my hatred of all things hippy. There are only 5 major gas stations I will buy gas from (places like WaWa and Quick Check are exempt due to their ease and great convenient stores). Lukoil was looking good but I found out they have some deals in place with Ahmonkeynajad and Iran, so fuck ‘em, not using them anymore.

Anyway, here are the “Top 5 To the Right of Wrong Gas Stations”:

5. Shell – Most of the gas sold here in the states that comes from Shell is made in the US, but they sure as hell use a lot of oil from the Middle East elsewhere. What offsets this is that they seem indifferent to Global Whining morons and simply throw them a bone on their website. Additionally, they are drilling in Alaska, something else I like since it makes hippies and Democrats equally irritable.

4. Exxon Mobil – The Giant. Sure I get mad when I look at the CEO’s pay and their insane profits. On the other hand, they give a sincere “fuck you” to hard-core eco-terrorists on their web page. There’s also a nifty little chart where they show how much money they are investing in oil and gas exploration in various parts of the world. They don’t play much lip service to the alternative energy sources like other companies either. I also like the fact that they are bitching about the amount of taxes they are forced to pay and that they at least griped with Chavez before finally folding (hey some money is better than none right?). Also, they are the company that helps me get through difficult days at work by conjuring up images of an oil spill. In those most stressful times, I simply imaging the Valdez Carnival Dunk Tank, where instead of water, it’s good old’ 5W 30 in the tank and instead of a person it’s a baby seal on the hot seat. How many balls does five bucks buy?

3. Hess – The Jets are lame, but the business model is solid. In fact, if not for having to deal with Indonesia and Algeria, they’d be rated higher. Algeria’s government at least fights terrorists, and Indonesia isn’t nearly as radical as the Middle East, but they’re borderline. What makes them rank higher than Exxon is that they don’t deal with the Middle East and their convenience stores are pretty damn good. 2 Liters of Aquafina for $2 is pretty nice, as is the included Blimpie’s at most of the stores. Plus, every time I see a Hess station I can envision Joe Namath hitting on Suzy Colbert.

2. Sunoco – Completely Middle East free. That’s a pretty solid thing for me. Plus, they have a lightning bolt in their logo, playing on the irony that if lightning were to hit their product supply it’s explode like a suicidal Muslim. Again, not much lip service paid to the hippies, it’s basically “we’re going to use all types of oil an gas and we’ll try to be cleaner about it if it doesn’t mean going broke or having to lay off employees.” Nice.

1. Valero - The largest refinery company in America also picked up some gas stations near us recently. Their CEO is the shit. In late April he went on the offense and said $4 a gallon is basically scare tactics and that its bad business for oil companies, people predicting this price, and that if indeed it did happen it would cripple the American economy. How true. Gotta love the honesty there. I’ve never seen an advertisement on TV from them yet (don’t screw it up guys) and I see a lot of stickers on the road from satisfied consumers. They get my top rating.

- Caomhin

Presidential Opinion Poll

Feel free to cast your vote and see how the straw poll stacks up. The coding was acquired from HotAir.

Al Gore Almost Killed My Girlfriend

When will this global warming nonsense come to an end? On Friday my girlfriend had to go the doctor because of severe sore throat and in general feeling like shit. She is asthmatic and as such albuterol is used to control attacks. Well now that Al Gore and his band of self loving, human hating hippies, are front and foremost, the normal prescription of albuterol no longer can be acquired in the USSA, I mean USA. ProAir was the new prescription that was assigned to my girlfriend, and lo and behold, she was allergic to it. Apparently this environmentally friendly new inhaler is Al Gore and the planeteers way of solving the crisis, less humans, less carbon. The reaction was slow but severe, as the doctor had advised her that taking more of that medication would have, in fact, killed her. A new prescription was given (another "environment friendly" one) so that has yet to be seen if it will be as effective as the one that is known to save lives. As this nonsense goes on, why is no one asking how it is that Al Gore is preaching this anti-human bullshit, making a profit on it, and is called a hero. ABC ran some bullshit last night that I saw three minutes, and one of the points they tried to make was that each person should walk to the store instead of driving there, and that will save the planet. Well that's novel. How the hell are you supposed to get groceries for the week. I'd also love to hear an elderly person take on how the fuck they are going to transport a 20 pound bag of dog food back to their house if they are walking a few miles. What I think the media (the biased tree hugging socialists that they are) should be doing about this so called World Global cLIEmate change is asking Fat Albert if he and his faggy friends will be flying around the world in one big jet and dumping massive amounts of carbon that they supposed want to prevent, or flying in an assload of smaller jets that will dump even more massive amounts of carbon into the air. I wonder too why someone from the media as asked, "Yes this question is for the Fat Sore Loser from Tennessee, who couldn't even carry his home state. Yes, I was wondering that since the population change is nearly identical to the raise in carbon if you are going to admit now that you are waging class warfare by promoting carbon offsets, which you stand to make a substantial profit off of, is your way of keeping poor folks from getting higher paying jobs which they would have to travel too. For follow ups you keep saying take the bus, but I notice you, nor anyone in your soviet style party are hopping on buses, and as a matter of fact, neither are the celebrities. Wouldn't you say that your policies and ideas on how to fix this cLIEmate issue is to force more people into poverty to prevent them form using things that emit carbon, such as cars, electricity, and breathing? Are you aware that products you are pushing are literally sucking the life out of asthmatics? Do you care?" I wonder what the reaction would be. Most likely, the typical Democratic response of "Right wing people don't know anything". What I do know is facts, and I have seen my girlfriend fighting for air, all because these faggy liberals can't stand for people getting medication that saves their lives, all for the benefit of a few sea otters and some polar bears (big ups to Knut). I wonder why in their fantasy world that animals count more than humans. I wonder why they triumph how great things to help fight poverty and disease (such as Product Red), when the bottom line is that Product Red has spent more in advertising than it has made in revenue, thereby giving $0 to the people they claim they want to help. Why not just cut that check directly to the people rather than make it a business venture? It's profit, and they do it in the most dishonest of ways. So I'd like to say a great fuck you to every hippie out there. Your surrendering, human hating, earth worshiping ways put you on the same scale as people in the Before Christ ears. Save people before you start crying about saving the planet you hypocritical, greedy, uncaring assfucks.

A Letter to Citgo

Dear Citgo:
Your leader, Hugo Chavez, a man who wants to crotch nozzle Lenin, a person who has made so many anti-American remarks in the past that it is borderline irresponsible to not mention this fact, has made it impossible for me to buy gasoline from your class warfare institution. I have seen a great deal of your commercials in the US about how you provide low price oil to low income households in exchange for their testimonials. However, unless an individual was essentially completely non lucid, one may ask, if you were truly concerned about the average America, and not just crotch nozzling for people to appear in commercials, why you would charge the exact market rate, and not a very much lower rate for those of us in America who are not rich. Granted, you have not given me the golden check as of yet, but none of us Capitalists who still believe in society are buying your bullshit. I'd sooner pay for baboon feces to power my automobile than for one red cent go to you. Have a lovely day.
Love,
(My Real Name)
-Caomhin

My Letter to Harry Reid

Well, come hell or high water, here is the letter I wrote to Harry Reid:

Dear Mr. Reid:
After hearing your comments about feeling that "war is lost" I am completely disheartened. Insufficient time has been given to determine if the surge is correctly working. The situation in Iraq is not a Civil War, the pretext that your party had put in place months before the 2004 election which you are currently reiterating in the media. The situation there is not a civil war. The policy your party is pursuing is nearly verbatim with those of Al Qaeda. Mr. Reid, you can fact check this with the press release of the terrorists. Again, deplorable, is our lack of response on the Darfur issue. Not one person in your party is even drawing a comparison to Japan, a model of success, even though you yourself say that economics is a measure of success in "victory." Having many friends in our military, I find it curious, that not one military leader has come out on your side. In fact, what is again a reprehensible statement is that your party has time and again stated that our bravest of citizens had died in vain while fighting for the freedom of people from another land. How disgracefully racist is it that the hard left elements of your party argue that the people of the Middle East cannot accept democracy, as if that is some virtue that is bestowed only upon Europe, America, Australia, and some Asian nations. How can you scrub emails from Karl Rove when hard documents that Sandy Berger had stolen were proven destroyed. The sad reality is that in the first 100 plus days since your party has been in office, your leaders have given photo ops to terrorist regimes, announced to the world that your party surrenders, that your ethical party can take more money in three months than the Republicans could take in a year in inappropriate contributions, and cover stories about conflicts of interests. Rest assured Mr. Reid, if you do not address these issues, and stop playing politics with every aspect of American culture, it is not President Bush who history will judge most harshly.
Sincerely:
(name omitted on here, but sent to Harry Reid)

-caomhin

Andy Rooney Needs His Old Ass Kicked

I almost never watch 60 Minutes, but tonight I flipped it on for something to watch before the Simpsons came on. Well I turned it on just in time to catch ol' prune face moron Andy Rooney come on the TV. About the only thing I ever found interesting about him was the old Beavis and Butthead skit on him, but that's another story. Today the little asshat was again pissing on our brave men and women in the service. Now normally I'm not one for punching an old man in the face, but let's face it, he deserves it. I especially feel that if you served in WWII, you should swift kick him in the balls and spit in his face. Actually, if you think the left isn't completely elitist, well you missed a tell tale story tonight. Ms. Rooney was spouting off about how the American military was terrible before the draft in WWII before the draft because it was full of losers. What constituted losers to Mr. Fuck Face? Well, loser would include high school drop outs and graduates. The saving grace to the military was when the government began drafting the "common" American who had college degrees, thereby instantly transforming our military into an invincible fighting machine. Well let's look at left wing politics today. Horse face John Kerry was talking about uneducated people stuck in Iraq and the media was quick to dismiss his "joke". Well here we are a few months later. His "joke" is Andy Rooney's truth, in fact, the truth of the left in general. In Rooney's opinion, our military is full of losers, non-college grads, who can't win a war. Well, I'm a college grad, and I'll go on the record to say that I know that I would not make as good a soldier as anyone in the Armed Forces right now. Does this make me a "chicken hawk"? No. This makes me rational, and unlike Mr. Rooney, respectful to our military. I know I can't run 15 miles a day, I own guns but I know I can't drill a bulls eye from 200 yards. Some people are good at certain things. Do you think that Bill Gates can fix a fuel pump on a Honda? Probably not. No one doubts his intelligence or expertise when he has a mechanic fix his vehicle, but yet the left seems to think they should get a pass when they question why every soldier isn't a Rhodes Scholar. In the left's opinion, the soldiers who are in our armed forces aren't even fit to decide to join. Why would the left's anti-war fanatics affix the names of soldiers who enlist in our military to their defeatist monuments without concern to what the soldier's own opinion was before they bravely and selflessly gave their lives to win the freedom of people they don't even know? The fact is the left does not support our military. The left does not support funding our troops, giving more money to pork than to our soldiers in harm's way. They ridicule and debase our troops for political gain. If you look at the returns from the military vote, as far as who the soldiers favor, and favor heavily, the soldiers know this. So when Democrats have a "slip of the tongue" what's really slipping is their elitist, defeatist bullshit. If a high school drop out joins the military, Andy Rooney labels him a loser, but if a high school drop out were to develop a zero-carbon engine, he'd be a hero. Fuck Andy Rooney, and if you see him, or any hard core, hard left fuck nut, kick them squarely in the balls for me.

-Caomhin