I know most of us have seen all the Republican debates, and I'm sure most of us also recall a good number of left wing analysts bashing Duncan Hunter for making a good number of anti-Chinese statements and how they violate technological patents and are openly a threat to the United States. Whenever Leftist pundits laugh, rest assured, vindication is right around the corner. Today, two stories break (unrelated stories which is even worse) of Chinese espionage here in the States involving a Department of Defense analyst and Boeing Engineers. From examining the article it seems like these two cases involved sales of weapons to Taiwan and to aerospace programs respectively. This is terrible news, of course. This is most likely a tip of the iceburg. Chinese spying goes back a long way and will continue going forward. We should be glad that these two cases were identified and pursued aggressively by the FBI, but much more work needs to be done. Recognizing this threat is something that should be paramount in the elections, and it will be interesting to see how much air time this gets. You'll recall that the Clintons did everything they could to appease the Chinese and crossed the line with them numerous times. Feel free throw "Clintons" and "Chinese" in Google to remind yourself.
It's not often you'll see me go to bat for Democrats on many issues, but the Clintons, the most notorious political crime family in American history, attempted to disenfranchise a large group of voters from being able to cast their votes because the Culinary Union had the gaul, the audacity, to not back her, but Barack "No Experience Needed" Obama in the caucuses. Here's the meat of the story:
The state teachers union went to court to challenge the plan, arguing that the casino caucus sites Saturday night will give the roughly 200,000 workers on the Las Vegas strip an unfair advantage over other voters who have to work that night.
But U.S. District Judge James Mahan rejected that argument after a Thursday morning hearing.
The lawsuit sparked a battle between the 28,000-member Nevada State Education Association and the state's biggest labor organization, the 60,000-member Nevada Culinary Workers Union, which supports the casino caucuses. The culinary workers endorsed Sen. BarackObama of Illinois in Saturday's contest and accused the teachers union of trying to tilt the race in favor of his leading rival, senator and former first lady Hillary Clinton of New York.
Hillary has very strong ties to leaders of the Teachers Union, who of course, was backing her. There was no problem with the mobile caucus precincts at all....until the Culinary Union came out and backed her opponent. The Teachers Union immediately sues. It's insanely transparent that the Clintons orchestrated this. Just like the are orchestrating racial and gender overtures and having their minions try to label Obama as the cocaine candidate. Personally, the Democrats can have their moonbat candidates, I don't like either one of them. I can't stand the political crime family, and Obama is the most abortion...loving...candidate....ever. What I do care about is not letting the Clintons pull these stunts on the public, because they will do it again in the general election if she wins, and the Democrats will do it regardless, but just not as much, if she doesn't. Hillary's campaign of race baiting, gender baiting, illegal immigration pandering, back door deals, and crooked fundraisers are a microcosm of what this woman does and will do in the future. She needs to go. What's even funnier about this situation is that the Teachers Union had no right to bring the suit at all, complaining that the Culinary Works will get an unfair advantage by being able to caucus on their lunch breach on a Saturday? A Saturday? Uh, Teachers don't work on Saturdays, isn't that the unfair advantage? Even the Liberals over at the Nation aren't buying her antics:
Since her loss in Iowa, Senator Hillary Clinton has been an outspoken critic of the caucus system, saying that the limited time allotted for voting disenfranchises too many workers who are on the job during those hours.
It seems in Nevada Clinton has had a change of heart.
Nah, neither she nor B.J. Clinton (Bill Jefferson, hey, we should have seen it coming) have a heart. For the record, here's Bill getting his hand caught in the cookie jar...by a liberal reporter. Gee he sure seems to know ALOT about the specifics of the account for someone who simply hear about it on TV. Hmmmm.....:
It's not that we are anti-Gay. The prefix of anti assumes a disposition that we on the right are essentially advocates of eradicating the gay population. This is totally wrong. We simply do not approve of the gay population based upon our moral beliefs, the same religious beliefs of which the Left claims they are respectful. However, we do tolerate the gay population. We advocate Civil Rights for Gays except in two cases, marriage and adoption. The main reason for marriage is the encroachment upon religious ceremonies. Had states properly separated themselves from religious aspects of marriage, this would not be an issue. Only a Church can marry. A state can "bond". I have no problem with a states decision to "bond" gays in a ceremony. I have a problem with at state "marrying" gays in a ceremony. Marriage is a sacrament of the Catholic faith. The state has no faith by definition. In regards to adoption, I feel that this is a benefit afforded a man and woman who are unable to produce a child who have shown their ability to raise a child correctly. This is natural procreation. Natural of course being the key term. Naturally any species that produces offspring only occurs between a male and female. There is no argument there. This is the normal and natural situation a child is born into. That being said, this is a situation for states to decide. This is not an issue to be overlorded by the Federal Government. This is something each state should decide for themselves. However, the MSM will not provide this choice to the masses. Their objective, along with the Liberals who have seized power, wrongfully, from a public who believed in the rhetoric of a Blue Dog Congress, have lied to America. The agenda on their plate is to concentrate Federal authority and destroy state authority provided in the Constitution. The Slate is a Leftist publication who will attack Republicans at all cost. That being said, we have all called upon Sen. Craig to resign based upon his actions being unbecoming of a Senator. All Gays are not trolling around our airports invading privacy and sexually harassing people in violation of the law. Sen. Craig was. That is why we call on him to resign. He broke the law, it's End Game for him. However, the MSM, especially uber-liberal SLATE, will do all they can to try and portray us as cavemen, evil, etc, instead of showing our personal opposition to a stance while saying we want the individuals of each state to carry out the Constitutional duty and respond for themselves how the issue should be handled. They are insanely biased from headlines, to rhetoric, Sen. Craig is even a worse villain for Supporting former Gov. Bill Clinton's positions on Gays in military while himself being homosexual. -Caomhin
