More Good News Coming In From Iraq Terrifies Liberals

Amazing you don't hear this stuff on the TV or the normal Mainstream Media outlets. Makes you wonder if they even care about how bias they are anymore. Yet another report has come in that Sunnis are working with the United States against al-Qaeda and seeking to get to the table with the government. This is exactly the sort of thing that Liberals claim they must see in order to show "true progress" in Iraq, but they have the resources to make sure they don't see it in that the hard lefties are firmly in control of what media hits you if you're not resourceful and practicing due diligence. Excellent news indeed and news that the Liberals want nothing to do with. They went all in on Iraq failing and that General Petraeus couldn't do enough in such a short time before they could force a reckless withdraw for political purposes. Except it's not happening. He is being successful. The Surge is working, and the political component is coming around. They know its working which is why they are digging in so hard right now to refuse to believe it, sort of like when you tell a child that Santa Claus isn't real. They can't fathom it is really happening. They're already gearing up to after General Petraeus personally after promising they would never do such a thing, but now that the facts and the proof is against them and their agenda, they are going to go their usual personal attacks. It won't work. Their plan for undermining the war effort and the troops is not going down the way they want it. They will not have the votes they so desperately need to force a genocidal withdraw from Iraq so that they can get the votes they so desperately want in the general election. Even more good news in this article by Ralph Peters that appeared in the New York Post. As more and more Sunni leaders are looking to get back to the political table and showing some faith in their own government, the Liberals lash out at yet another target in the Iraqi Prime Minister, al-Maliki. One of their oldest rallying cries against the war was that Democracy wouldn't work in Iraq, that their way of life was too different then ours (a racist stance by the way), and yet when the elect their own leader, regardless of what we think of him, he was elected democratically. We rightly get upset when foreign leaders cry for President Bush's removal as being a direct violation of our laws and Democracy, but yet this POWER HUNGRY HILLARY CLINTON DIRECTLY INTERFERES WITH IRAQ'S DEMOCRATICALLY ELECTED LEADER BY CALLING FOR HIS REMOVAL SO THAT SHE CAN GET MORE VOTES HERE IN THE UNITED STATES. Personally I don't think al-Maliki is a very effective leader or the best choice for the pro-U.S. position for many reasons, including his closeness with Iran, but it's not my decision. It's not Americans decisions. We're not the ones living next to crazy mullahs and psycho jihadis, in that regards they are much different than our own. We must respect their decision and help foster their democracy. What we must not do is what Hilldog Clinton and the uber-liberals have done,t which is first decry them as savages incapable of having a democracy, and then openly undermining their democratically elected government for their own political gains once they are proven wrong about their ability to have a democracy in the first place.
-Caomhin

Moving Goalposts Set Up by Defeatist Tools

Seriously, at what point does the political aspirations of the Democratic Party just blatantly scream that THEY DO NOT CARE ABOUT STATESMANSHIP, NATIONAL SECURITY, OR THEIR OWN WORDS. Today Sen. Levin (D-angerously incompetent) admitted as much. Here is his quote proving how the Democrats know that the Surge is working militarily, extremely well, so what do the Democrats want to do? Move the goal posts. Forget all the military benchmarks and ignore the reconciliation progress that I have noted in previous posts that are starting to take foot in the political arena of Iraq.

"I'm going to try to see if we can't shift the attention of the American people from the report on the military situation to a report on the political situation since everybody acknowledges that it's the failure of the political arena and the political areas that are the cause of the ongoing violence in Iraq."

Shift the attention of the American people from the military situation (going so well that Gen. Petraeus is actually considering suggesting scaling down the number of troops) onto the political situation (that is starting to improve). The main idea here for the Dems is that by showing how the political process is not on par with the military success (which they previously chided as being failed, but is now turned around) that the war is lost, as they have been saying pretty much since the first casualty in the war. Of course logic and all sense dictates that in order for an orderly, politically evolved society to exist the safety of the citizens comes first. After all, show me an effective government operating at full political organizational capacity that is not secure. Just name one...... Exactly. Doesn't happen. Security comes first. Once the violence dies down, rational behavior and dialogue kicks in, except in this case, the Democrats last hopes for not being proven to be the weak cowards that they are on National Security this can not happen. If this does happen, it's game over for the Left. When we win this war after they pinned all their hopes and political dreams on its failure, its Lights Out for the Donkeys. For a further examination of the just how pathetic the Left is in regards to this war read Tony Blankley's "Democracts' Disgrace," published in the Washington Times. So yes I question their patriotism and I'll debate any Lefty on this issue anytime, anywhere.
-Caomhin